Financial-Analyst Russian Brokerage Company: Russian Stock Market, Finance & Investment in Russia, Russian Stocks

EU
   
 
About Finam
Company News
Awards
Contact Us
News & Events
Morning Breaking News
Upcoming Events
Research
Market Roundup
Daily Comments
Desknotes
Ratings
Model Portfolios
Sectors & Companies
i-SERVICES
Finam Trade
Charts (JAVA)
Combined Charts
Charts
Stock Quotes
Gainers & Losers
Subscribe
Our Services
Finam Capital
 
   

Daily analyst comments

Gazprom Neft reports 1Q 2009 US GAAP financials

Gazprom Neft

Capitalization
18 036 899 499,68 $
Common shares
Price 3,80 $
Price changing
week
month
year
0,7% -11,6% 8,7%

19.06.09 10:33

The 1Q 2009 financial results of Gazprom Neft have slightly exceeded expectations on both the EBITDA and net income indicators. The results show the company’s ability to keep its expenses in check and also reveal hefty Forex losses, as was the case in the previous quarter.

On June 18, Gazprom Neft published unaudited consolidated US GAAP financials for 1Q 2009, which show revenue contraction of 48% y-o-y, largely attributed to a 52% drop in the average Urals oil price and a 7.3% contraction of oil production. In the interim, oil refining expanded 4.1%, as the company continued to step up in-house oil refining by reinforcing the vertical integration of its production chain. In so doing the oil major has managed to keep its profit margins above the industry average in defiance of the crisis.

Table. Gazprom Neft: basic financial indices for 1Q 2008 and 1Q 2009

Indicator 1Q 2008 1Q 2009 1Q 2009/1Q 2008
Sales revenue, mn USD 8 045 4 185 -48.0%
Taxes and duties other than income tax, mn USD 2 826 1 237 -56.2%
The cost of purchased oil, gas and oil products, mn USD 2 095 846 -59.6%
Other operating expenses, mn 1 460 1 549 +6.1%
EBITDA, mn USD 2 195 945 -56.9%
Net income, mn USD 1 411 335 -76.3%
EBITDA margin, % 27.3% 22.6% -4.7 pp
Net income, % 17.5% 8.0% -9.5 pp

EBITDA slumped 57% to USD 945 million. The company saw its oil-price-dependent expenses, namely, payments of mineral extraction tax and duties, as well as its costs of purchased oil, gas and oil products, decrease faster than global oil prices, revealing its ability to efficiently control its shipments, including oil export supplies. In this regard, Gazprom Neft has outperformed Lukoil, while slightly yielding to Rosneft. Controls over administrative expenses, which soared 54%, were the company’s weakest point, although this indicator was strongly affected by the acquisition of a 51% stake in Serbian company NIS at the start of 2009. The company saw its EBITDA margin shrink by 5 pp to 23%, as a result, but still remained the industry leader on this indicator.

Net income plunged 76% to USD 335 million, mainly due to a heavy Forex loss of USD 166 million. Numerous oil majors incurred heavy Forex losses in 4Q 2008 and the ruble devaluation continued in 1Q 2009. Despite this, some oil companies, including LUKOIL, managed to avoid Forex losses, having hedged their currency risks in time. By contrast, Gazprom Neft has showed lax controls over Forex risks.

In general, Gazprom Neft posted reasonable production results and showed efficient control over costs. In our view, the results published may have a positive impact on its stock valuations in fundamental terms.

Other comments of the day

© 1994-2010 FINAM. Russian Federation Copyright. All rights reserved.